I am really looking forward to presenting about this topic at the NAG Seminar 2026 in Nottingham on May 20th and May 21st (open for bookings now, get signed up and if you aren’t a NAG member, consider joining this fantastic organisation)
At the seminar, I will be talking very specifically about the knowledge and expertise that has been invaluable from our teams at University of York, consider this a teaser article that covers a small fraction of the concepts, ideas, and examples that will be delivered (powerpoint style) to Seminar attendees.
“Centralised systems are best! Do you really need all those spreadsheets? Wouldn’t it be easier to just get all your data from our shiny system? Why keep all that messy data spread out over so many teams? Don’t you want to retire all of those dusty old spreadsheets?”
This is the siren song of the modern vendor. Whether it’s a global publisher or a data aggregator, the message is relentless: centralise, codify, and create efficiencies. They want us to retire those dusty old spreadsheets and move everything into a proprietary, cloud-based black box. It is a powerful sentiment, and on the surface, it makes perfect sense. Who wouldn’t want a sleek, unified dashboard over a mess of local files?
However, as we have discovered at the University of York, the efficiency of a system is often a fair-weather friend. When the time comes to leave those services, or when the system’s development roadmap no longer aligns with the institution’s strategic interests, the messy data and the deep knowledge of the staff suddenly become our most vital assets. While systems offer scale, they often lack the granular resilience of human expertise.

Image by Bob Dmyt from Pixabay
Read More »

